The Trust Factor: Turning Business to Business (B2B) into Business With Business (BWB)

5 Comments

Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn

Trust isn’t a perk or a byproduct of doing business – it’s the foundation on which every deal is built. Without it, even the most compelling pitch falls flat. Like currency, trust can be invested wisely to create lasting value or squandered through poor decisions and short-term thinking. Buyers operating in high-stakes B2B environments aren’t just looking for the best product or service; they’re looking for confidence that the company they choose will deliver on its promises. A single misstep – an unanswered question, a hidden clause, or a lack of transparency – can derail months worth of effort. In contrast, when trust is earned and reinforced at every stage, the path to a deal becomes clearer, smoother, and more predictable.

In a 2024 report, Forrester revealed that buyers tend to behave differently in a B2B setting than they do as consumers. There is a weight of expectation on their shoulders, because they’re not buying for themselves or their family – they’re buying on behalf of their organization using their organization’s resources. The report revealed that B2B buyers are nearly twice as likely (85% versus 48%) to do business with a supplier or partner if a sense of trust is established from the outset, regardless of need. It’s worth noting that the title of this report is “Are B2B Buyers Cowards?” – a myth that the report attempts, successfully, to debunk. 

The problem is that traditional B2B sales journeys don’t always lend themselves to trust. Long cycles, multiple stakeholders, and competing priorities can create an environment where buyers feel more like outsiders than partners in the process. Meanwhile, sellers – under pressure to hit quotas – may subconsciously prioritize closing over clarity. But you can’t brute force trust. It isn’t built through persuasion or “talking a good talk,” it’s built through transparency, empathy, and shared understanding. For sales teams that recognize this and embed it into their values, the real opportunity lies not in selling harder, but in collaborating smarter – creating an experience where both sides feel aligned, informed, and deeply engaged. 

You Can’t Build a Castle on Sand

For all the effort sales teams put into winning new business, the traditional B2B sales process often works against them. Buyers, tasked with making high-stakes decisions, are expected to navigate a maze of emails, proposals, follow-ups, and stakeholder approvals with little in the way of control or visibility into the process. They are forced into a reactive position, scrambling to pull information together before they begin making any decisions. Sellers, on the other hand, focus on moving deals through the pipeline as efficiently as possible, often prioritizing their internal metrics over the buyer’s experience. The result? A castle built on sand. Deals stall, frustration builds, and trust erodes – not because of bad intentions, but because the process itself is flawed.

The inherent lack of transparency only makes matters worse. When information is scattered across different systems and communication is inconsistent, buyers are left feeling like they’re chasing answers rather than being guided toward a decision. Internal approvals become bottlenecks, simple questions turn into multi-email exchanges, and important documents get buried in inboxes and Dropbox folders. Sellers, meanwhile, risk losing credibility when they fail to follow through or when their messaging feels short or ill-considered, assuming knowledge on the buyer’s side. Sending hundreds of emails with no real strategy or concern given to time or context can come off as tone-deaf. Without a clear, open, and structured way for both sides to stay aligned, the sales process quickly becomes an exercise in endurance rather than a path to fruitful partnership.

B2B is dead – it’s time for BwB

The dynamic of old-school B2B establishes the seller as the driver and the buyer as the passenger. One party is at the wheel, choosing the direction of travel and setting the agenda, while the other remains passive, wondering about the destination and the stops along the way. The problem with this model is that it demands trust from the outset despite doing nothing to earn it. Buyers aren’t passengers – they’re stakeholders with internal responsibilities, deadlines, and competing interests and priorities. 

A Business-with-Business (BwB) approach reframes this relationship. Instead of sellers controlling the flow of information, both sides operate with equal visibility and access. This means shared access to documents, meeting summaries, proposals, and communication logs. Commitments are tracked, follow-ups are proactive, and accountability and transparency is built into every interaction. This doesn’t just help buyers gather the information they need – it builds trust by demonstrating that sellers are reliable, organized, and invested in the buyer’s success. With buyers and sellers operating on the same footing, sales conversations become collaborative problem-solving efforts, and deals are driven by shared outcomes, not one-sided persuasion. To go back to the driving analogy, BwB puts the map and itinerary in the hands of both buyer and seller, so both sides can anticipate and plan for the next leg of the journey. 

“People Buy People” – Where Does AI Fit In?

The idea that “people buy people” goes back a long way, and that still holds true. But in complex sales cycles where interactions span weeks or months, remembering every promise, follow-up, and stakeholder concern can be challenging. This is where AI becomes a force multiplier. By logging commitments, tracking buyer engagement, assessing sentiment, and surfacing relevant information at the right time, AI ensures that nothing falls through the net. Buyers no longer have to chase sellers for updates, and sellers can anticipate buyer needs before they even ask. AI-driven insights can help to “read the room,” identify hesitation, and suggest the next best action – ensuring that conversations remain relevant and timely. Instead of feeling like they’re being pushed toward a deal, buyers experience a guided process where they feel supported, informed, and even empowered.

AI also brings a level of fairness and transparency to the sales process that was previously difficult to achieve. Coalescing documents, communications, and decision-making criteria into one place eliminates the confusion caused by scattered information and inconsistent messaging. It levels the playing field, giving buyers the same access to critical details as sellers. More importantly, it shifts sales from being a reactive process – where sellers scramble to “keep up” with buyers – to a proactive one, where buyers feel confidently in the loop. In this environment, trust stops being something sellers have to earn through persuasion and becomes something they demonstrate through clarity, consistency, and reliability.

The B2B sales playbook is due a rewrite. In 2025, deal-closers won’t be those who push hardest, but those who push smartest, championing buyers through trust, transparency, openness, and maybe – just maybe – letting the buyer drive once in a while.

Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn

Andrew Fritts
Andrew Fritts is the CEO of Augment AI. He has built an impressive career in sales leadership, working at companies like Accenture, N3, and ON24. After graduating from Dartmouth College with degrees in English and Government, Andrew spent over 25 years managing sales teams and developing strategies to help companies sell more effectively.

5 COMMENTS

  1. “AI also brings a level of fairness and transparency to the sales process that was previously difficult to achieve”

    I’d argue that this should be a conditional. While this technically is right, the whole interaction that is part of the sales process is managed via the vendor’s CRM/engagement system. Depending on vendor’s corporate philosophy (looking inside-out or outside-in – the former being prevalent) AI will not level the playing field but tilt it further into the vendor’s favor.

    It really hinges on whether the vendor defines the own (sales/monetary) success as a consequence of making the customer successful or as an increased top- or bottom line.

  2. Agree and am a little biased because of the work I do in emotional intelligence. Human beings like “control and choice.” When they are in the drivers seat, it decreases any fight or flight responses. Also, selling to really smart buyers is a co-creation process where both parties bring their experience and expertise. THAT creates a great outcome.

  3. Hi Andrew, your insights strongly resonate with me. Trust is truly foundational—essential to genuine, successful business relationships. Your shift from traditional B2B toward a BwB model, emphasizing mutual transparency and collaboration, is particularly compelling.

    From my own experience, there’s always been a duality between suppliers and decision-makers. Each side naturally has its own goals and priorities. While this dynamic feels inherent and challenging to shift, your ideas offer a promising path toward better alignment. Let’s observe if there is shift coming. thanks for your perspective, Kr Ricardo

  4. “With” versus “To” is my dream for every type of organization (B2B, B2C, government, nonprofit — and even recruiters, freelancers, doctors, lawyers, etc.). It’s treating one another with mutual respect as mature adults. Relationship and reputation may even become more important as tech/AI uses expand.

    In B2B, there is a vast variety of circumstances, norms, and business models. For heavy equipment, construction of roadways and buildings, and other critical endeavors, the relationship is built-in with vital specifications for accuracy, timeliness, and ongoing inter-dependencies. In these cases, dedicated account teams typically have built-in journey maps and engagement modes (much more inherent than the popular B2C maps and tactics).

    In the semiconductor equipment industry, for example, there are a finite number of customers who make semiconductors. And they’re all much larger than the equipment makers. So, the semiconductor companies issue supplier scorecards regularly to let their suppliers know their strengths and weaknesses. At the same time, the vision for next-gen technology and possibilities is typically generated by the sellers. Beta sites for proof of market-worthiness, technical symposiums, and joint ventures make information sharing and influence quite interesting.

    On the other hand, in B2B SaaS firms, the dynamics are often quite different. Customer Success teams are essentially the post-sale equivalent of dedicated Account Teams in the traditional B2B model.

    Of course, there are small B2B firms and commodities B2B firms. Most are manufacturers, some are growers, and many are distributors and middlemen, in addition to B2B service providers.

    In any case, I vote for “With”, Andrew. Integrity is at an all-time low globally. That’s the scary news to me. Thanks for emphasizing urgent need for mutual trust.

  5. I strongly agree on the importance of trust in the B2B relationship, which Gartner has also reported on (although they find the most important factor is a buyer’s confidence in his or her ability to make a good decision, which is influenced by trust in the provider). In my research of 200+ CX programs, I found that the most effective B2B organizations measure trust and other emotions to guide customer engagement.

    We found similar results in our analysis of a survey of 7,200+ manufacturing buyers in partnership with the Advanced Manufacturing CX Consortium. Trust best predicted a buyer’s intent to grow with their provider (https://heartofthecustomer.com/how-the-world-makes-b2b-supplier-contract-decisions/).

    For too long, emotions such as trust were seen as the domain of B2C organizations. It’s time we realize that nothing matters more in the B2B experience than the ability to create trust and confidence.

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Please use comments to add value to the discussion. Maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. We will NOT PUBLISH brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here