AI now has synthetic empathy with consumers: Breakthrough or problem?

Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn

AI-powered interactions are becoming more human-like, and businesses are embracing emotionally intelligent AI to enhance customer experience, powering what is projected to become a $13.8 billion market by 2032. But as AI takes on a bigger role in support, marketing, and even finance, companies must ask: Does simulating empathy build trust, or does it risk making AI interactions feel artificial?

A customer initiates a chat with an AI-powered support assistant about a delayed package: “Where’s my order? It was supposed to arrive yesterday.” The chatbot responds, “I completely understand how frustrating this must be for you. Your time is valuable, and I truly feel for you.”

A polite response, even sympathetic. But something about it feels off. The AI doesn’t feel anything. It’s not actually frustrated on the customer’s behalf, nor does it genuinely value their time. It’s just following a programmed pattern, designed to sound empathetic.

I’m noticing this type of interaction in more and more apps. It’s something we’re calling synthetic empathy, when AI mimics emotional intelligence without truly understanding emotions. It’s convincing enough to make users feel heard, but is that always a good thing?

Used strategically, synthetic empathy can smooth interactions and improve engagement. But when overdone, it feels forced — like an AI trying too hard to be human. While businesses should embrace this development in customer experience, they also should be mindful of the challenges that come with just adopting this technology; mainly, knowing where and when it actually adds value.

How AI creates synthetic empathy

In human interactions, emotional intelligence is the ability to recognize, process, and respond to emotions appropriately. It’s what makes conversations feel natural, genuine, and effective. In our brains, emotions are created and regulated through a complex interaction between our limbic system, anterior cingulate cortex, and prefrontal cortex, and alike. It’s not just a combination of words, but a bodily function that has physical and psychological implications.

AI, on the other hand, doesn’t physically create or experience emotions; it simply predicts the most appropriate response based on patterns in data. Through sentiment analysis, natural language processing (NLP), and conversational training, AI can detect frustration (and vocal inflections), adjust its tone, and mirror emotional cues. This makes interactions feel more personal, even when no real understanding exists.

This is the essence of synthetic empathy: AI replicating emotional intelligence linguistically well enough to make users believe they’re being understood. And when done right, it can make customer interactions smoother, more engaging, and even de-escalate tense situations. But there’s a fine line between enhancing conversations and making them feel uncanny or manipulative.

So where does synthetic empathy actually improve the customer experience? And where does it risk going too far?

When should businesses use synthetic empathy?

Not every AI interaction needs to be emotionally intelligent. In some cases, adding a layer of perceived empathy enhances customer experience. In others, it feels unnecessary or even unsettling. Businesses must define where synthetic empathy adds value and where AI should remain purely functional.

AI works particularly well in customer service. Let’s say a user has a negative experience.

Customer: “My item was damaged. This is really frustrating.”

AI response: “I completely understand how disappointing that must be. I’ll process a replacement for you right away.”

This response acknowledges frustration and provides a solution, making AI helpful rather than intrusive.

But you probably wouldn’t want customer-facing AI in a sector like financial services …

Applicant: “Why was my loan denied?”

AI response: “I know this is disappointing. Let’s talk through how you’re feeling about it.”

This feels tone-deaf. A consumer in financial distress needs transparency, not forced empathy.

Here’s where synthetic empathy works best

  • Customer support agents – Detecting frustration and adjusting tone can de-escalate interactions.
  • Hospitality and travel booking AI – AI can acknowledge preferences and emotions to improve experience.
  • Wellness and mental health apps – AI can mirror understanding while maintaining clear boundaries.

And here’s where synthetic empathy doesn’t work as well

  • Financial advising and legal services – AI must be factual, not emotionally suggestive.
  • Routine transactions (e.g., payroll processing, invoice management) – Efficiency matters more than emotional engagement.
  • High-stakes customer interactions – False empathy in medical diagnoses, for instance, could create ethical issues.

How businesses can mitigate the risks of synthetic empathy

As companies invest in more complex AI-driven customer interactions, they need to draw clear boundaries around when and how synthetic empathy is deployed. Overuse can make AI interactions feel insincere, intrusive, or even manipulative — damaging trust rather than improving customer experience.

3 ways to use synthetic empathy

  1. Match empathy to context
    Not all interactions require an emotional response. AI should recognize when empathy is helpful (e.g., handling complaints, de-escalating frustration) and when it’s unnecessary (e.g., confirming an order status). Businesses should design AI to calibrate its tone based on the situation.
  2. Be transparent
    Users don’t need a full disclaimer before every AI conversation, but misleading them into believing AI has emotional depth can backfire. Brands should create policies for when AI interactions should feel seamless and when customers should know they’re talking to a bot.
  3. Deliver empathy without overpromising
    If an AI system expresses sympathy for a problem, it should also help resolve it. Telling a customer “I understand your frustration” while offering no solution creates an uncanny valley of customer service — when interactions feel both too human and yet not human enough.

Striking the right balance with synthetic empathy

AI is not here to replace human connection in customer service. It’s here to facilitate better interactions. When synthetic empathy is overused, it shifts from being a helpful tool to a thinly veiled performance. Customers do not need AI to care. They need it to be clear, efficient, and unobtrusive. The real measure of success is not whether AI sounds like an emotionally caring human being. It is whether businesses can use it to enhance customer experience while also making interactions smarter, faster, and more effective in ways that human support alone never could.

Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn

John Kim
John S. Kim is the Co-Founder and CEO of Sendbird (YC W16), the omnichannel AI agent platform enterprises that automates support & sales conversations, keeping humans in the loop for complex inquiries, and re-engaging customers with proactive business messages. Combining omnichannel AI and a battle-tested, award-winning communication APIs, Sendbird enables businesses to build AI agents and meaningful customer connections at scale.Trusted by 4,000+ leading apps—including DoorDash, Match Group, Noom, and Yahoo Sports—Sendbird powers over 7 billion conversations every month, offering exceptiona

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Please use comments to add value to the discussion. Maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. We will NOT PUBLISH brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here