Your Relative Performance: A Better Predictor of Employee Turnover


Share on LinkedIn

Last week, I compared two employee turnover metrics. One metric was a self-reported measure gathered through surveys. The other metric reflected the employment status at a later date (the objective metric). The analysis showed that, while self-reported intentions to quit predicted whether or not the employee actually quit, the correlation between the two metrics was only r = .31. Are there other, better predictors of actual employee turnover? In this week’s post, I dive deeper into that study’s data to show the predictive power of another self-reported metric.

The Power of Relative Performance

In the aforementioned study, we have a few other employee survey questions that might help us better predict employee turnover:

  • Overall employee satisfaction: Overall, how satisfied are you with company name as an employer? (0-Extremely dissatisfied to 10-Extremely satisfied)
  • Likelihood to recommend employer: How likely are you to recommend company name to your friends as a place to work? (0-not at all likely to 10-Extremely likely)
  • Relative performance: How does company name compare as an employer to other companies where you have worked? (0-Worst to 100-Best)

Using the 2-year turnover behavior as the outcome variable, I found that, compared to all other questions, relative performance (r = .41), was the best predictor of employment status two years later. The other employee loyalty metrics were less predictive of employment status two years later (Overall satisfaction: r = .27; Likelihood to recommend: r = .36; Likelihood to quit: r = .31). As you can see in Figure 1, employee retention was strongly related to how the employee compared the employer to past employers. Employees who believe they are working for the best employer have a two-year retention rate of 96%. On the other hand, employees who believe they are working for an average (or worse than average) employer are more likely to be gone in two years (retention rate of 63% and 27%).

Employee Relative Performance on Employee Retention Rate

Figure 1. Your relative performance is important. How your employees compare you to previous employers was the best predictor of real employee turnover behavior.

Summary and Conclusions

In the current study, the best predictor of employee turnover two years later was not the employee’s intention to quit, but, rather, how the employee compared you to previous employers.

Knowing how your employees feel about you relative to former employers can help you accurately estimate future levels of employee retention (helping in resource planning). For example, of employees who felt the employer was the best, over 90% of them were around two years later. Of employees who felt the employer was better than some, only about 30% of them will be around two years later. Understanding the reasons why employers rank you high or low would be a good start at understanding how to improve employee retention.

How your employees compare you to previous employers is the top early warning indicator of employment status two years later, more so than employees’ stated intention of leaving. In your employee survey, consider asking your employees to compare you to other employers. It could give you some useful insight about your future employee turnover rate as well as identifying ways to best decrease employee churn.

Republished with author's permission from original post.


Please use comments to add value to the discussion. Maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. We will NOT PUBLISH brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here