{"id":80873,"date":"2005-06-02T23:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-03T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/customerthink.com\/what_you_shouldnt_have_is_a_failure_to_communicate\/"},"modified":"2005-06-02T23:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-03T06:00:00","slug":"what_you_shouldnt_have_is_a_failure_to_communicate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/what_you_shouldnt_have_is_a_failure_to_communicate\/","title":{"rendered":"What You Shouldn’t Have Is a Failure To Communicate"},"content":{"rendered":"

There’s a line from the old Paul Newman movie, Cool Hand Luke<\/i>, "What we have here is a failure to communicate." It was an extremely popular part of American culture for a short while, though it has gone the way of pet rocks. But the point still resonates. <\/p>\n

You could develop the greatest CRM strategy in the history of the species, but if you fail to communicate it, it don’t matter—<\/as>to me or anyone else. <\/p>\n

Communicating CRM strategy isn’t so easy. What do you communicate? To whom? How frequently do you communicate it? How much of the strategy do you communicate? With what tools and via what media do you transmit whatever it is you’re communicating? Is the communication "approach" or is it "feel"? Is it formal, informal or something of both? Is training part of communicating? Should it be? <\/p>\n

OK, I presume I’ve made the point. It’s a pain in the neck and yet one that needs to be felt all the time. <\/p>\n

Here’s a brief tutorial on the right way to communicate a change in strategy. <\/p>\n

What do you communicate to whom?<\/b>
A change in strategy will have specific impacts on different departments. For example, sales compensation might be affected by the CRM strategy. Sales will now be compensated on an account basis, rather than a contract-by-contract basis because of the importance of working directly with the customer over a long period of time. Well, obviously sales has to know about the compensation change and why the compensation change and what the context for it is and how this benefits the salespeople directly. That means not<\/i> how it benefits the company or the amorphous future but an unambiguous explanation as to why it benefits the salesperson. <\/p>\n

You are dramatically changing that salesperson’s way of deriving the income that feeds and clothes his or her family. You’d better be able to communicate the strategy in the salesperson’s terms and for his or her benefit. I call it communicating what is basically a "commonwealth of self-interest." But that also is none of marketing’s or support’s business and not something anyone in either of those departments generally needs to know about.<\/p>\n