In 1934 Belgium, Paul Otlet imagined social networks where people could “participate, applaud, give ovations, sing in the chorus”. He envisaged “the ability to trade messages, participate in discussions and work together to collect and organize documents.”<\/p>\n
Our relationship technology has not even caught up to what the early pioneers imagined. Consider the possibilities for valuable business-customer community building!<\/p>\n
Today’s (June 17 2008) New York Times carries the tale of technology’s lost pioneer: Paul Otlet who “sketched out plans for a global network of computers… that would allow people to search and browse through millions of interlinked documents, images, audio and video files. He described how people would use the devices to send messages to one another, share files and even congregate in online social networks.”<\/p>\n
The Web Time Forgot<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n “Otlet’s version of hypertext held a few important advantages over today’s Web. For one thing, he saw a smarter kind of hyperlink. Whereas links on the Web today serve as a kind of mute bond between documents, Otlet envisioned links that carried meaning, for example, annotating if particular documents agreed or disagreed with each other. That facility is notably lacking in the dumb logic of modern hyperlinks.”<\/p>\n The dumb hyperlink is just as limiting as paper documents on our thinking. The original concepts of hyperlinks were far smarter than what was originally implemented by Tim Berners Lee, who was constrained by the technology of the 70’s and 80’s in what was feasible at the beginning of the World Wide Web.<\/p>\n The NY Times article elsewhere writes<\/p>\n “…Historians typicaly trace the origins of the World Wide Web through a lineage of Anglo-American invesntors like Vannevar bush, Doug Engelbart and Ted Nelson.”<\/p>\n In fact Engelbart and Ted Nelson foresaw MUCH SMARTER hyperlinks than we use today.<\/p>\n Engelbart imagined Links that not were not only annotated like Otlet’s – “agree” “disagree” “neutral” “mildly supporting” “standing ovation” but were able to contain logical arguments through a series of argued links. His version of hyperlinks encompassed notions from IBIS – Issue-based Information Systems. <\/p>\n