{"id":68142,"date":"2010-12-15T14:28:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-15T22:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/customerthink.com\/painting_a_customer_service_strategy_session_5\/"},"modified":"2010-12-15T14:28:00","modified_gmt":"2010-12-15T22:28:00","slug":"painting_a_customer_service_strategy_session_5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/painting_a_customer_service_strategy_session_5\/","title":{"rendered":"Painting A Customer Service Strategy:session 5"},"content":{"rendered":"

What are the management implications of trying to live by a customer service strategy?<\/p>\n

Previous sessions (one<\/a>, two<\/a>, three<\/a> and four<\/a>) have already explored quite a bit of the relevant context and content for painting a customer service strategy if you want to catch up.<\/p>\n

In this next set of sessions, I’m assuming you already have one in your purse or back pocket and are now ready to move onto ‘maintenance’ considerations. By this I mean tilling the corporate soil to ensure optimal rooting and blooming. Or if the gardening metaphors don’t do it for you, starting to think about the numerous, ongoing circumstances that can undo all your hard work up to this point.<\/p>\n

Let me explain with a little scene setting.<\/p>\n

The Problems With Not Thinking It Through<\/h3>\n

I’m sure you’ve noticed the vast majority of corporate solutions for supporting customers are arrived at in isolation. No doubt the decisions that give the green light to each solution have sufficient, stand-alone logic to feel like progress is being made. The trouble comes when they have to operationally co-exist with other each. Piecemeal design never works. That’s why ‘strategies need painting’ to provide view of the full landscape.<\/p>\n

What is even more galling is that these decision makers are normally completely unaware of the downstream chaos they cause. So, in reaction to these ‘unwelcome’ consequences, such as slipped time-scales<\/a> and performance shortfalls, they further compound a situation by piling on the pressure to demand things work immediately. Something has to give and so the usual outcome is shoddy implementation that shows up later in either sub optimal running costs or disappointing C-sat scores. But, underneath it all, their sloppy thinking is really to blame.<\/p>\n

How A Lack Of A Strategy Prevents Excellence Breaking Out<\/h3>\n

These kind of downsides are well known. They are experienced throughout the length and breadth of the global customer service community as daily frustrations. And just to make sure the operational backdrop I’m sketching out is crystal clear in your mind, here’s the top three symptoms you’ve no doubt come across in one form or another:<\/p>\n