{"id":148808,"date":"2015-02-03T23:51:05","date_gmt":"2015-02-04T07:51:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/customerthink.com\/?p=148808"},"modified":"2015-02-03T23:51:05","modified_gmt":"2015-02-04T07:51:05","slug":"customer-satisfaction-survey-response-rates-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/customer-satisfaction-survey-response-rates-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Customer Satisfaction Survey Response Rates \u2013 Update"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Response<\/a><\/p>\n

Over the past couple days I\u2019ve been researching the general subject of Survey Response Rates. My normal interest in the subject became elevated when I ran across an article having to do with the ACSI (or American Customer Satisfaction Index).
\nWhat caught my attention in terms of this email was the following quote \u2013<\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n

\u201cThe American Customer Satisfaction Index found that response rates for paper-based surveys were around 10% and the response rates for e-surveys (web, wap and e-mail) were averaging between 5% and 15% \u2013 which can only provide a straw poll of the customers\u2019 opinions.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n

While it\u2019s not news that electronic survey response rates have been steadily eroding for the past twenty years, I was very surprised to read that, in at least some cases, they were now performing similarly to the long-maligned paper survey. After reading the statement, various additional questions sprang to mind; chief among them, is that response range indicative of the entire industry, or is it a product of something that ACSI is doing? I must have visited 75 web sites in a search for the answer to that question. The results were decidedly mixed.<\/p>\n

First off, of the thousands of web survey providers out there, I ran across quite a few claiming they had achieved some pretty lofty response rates. In support of supposedly \u201cproprietary techniques\u201d, I found companies claiming that they had achieved 30%, 50%, even 80% response rates. One company even claimed to have hit 100%, more than once. Most of those assertions, however, seemed to have caveats, both openly stated and inferred, attached to them; qualifiers like \u201ca survey of a very small body of very closely intertwined customers\u201d. In other words, many of the high response rates were probably based on having sent out ten survey invitations. After discounting those sort of claims, and after reading between the lines on other sites, it was clear that no-one anywhere was making claim that they can consistently hit numbers anywhere near those kind of totals. In fact, no-one anywhere seemed to make any kind of claims at all as to what they can consistently hit. No averages, no medians, no realistic expectations or long term histories of any kind.<\/p>\n

Secondly, in my travels I ran across quite a number of academic and research company generated articles which, though presenting another fairly broad range of results, seemed to average out to a reasonable expectation of something in the 10% to 15% range, and probably trending closer to the lower number. I was not able to locate a definitive voice of the industry on the matter, but will continue looking when or as time allows.<\/p>\n

One opinion that I did run into over and over again what that response rates to surveys in general \u2013 and of course most references on the web are to paper, internet or telephone \u2013 have ALL been declining over the past ten years. I find that imminently believable given our own history, which has been consistent with that trend. In the mid and late \u201990\u2019s, we consistently came in at 75% to 80%. By the mid to late \u201900\u2019s though, we dropped to closer to 70%, sometimes less. In the current decade we are so far running closer to 68%, and sometimes less.<\/p>\n

There has been plenty of teeth gnashing and navel gazing around here in recent years as we have repeatedly tried to figure out why we are no longer hitting the kinds of numbers we used to routinely enjoy. We\u2019ve reviewed our operations, our validation procedures, the content of advance notification letters, the callers we use, anything we could think of that might be having an impact on response rates and, with rare exceptions, we found nothing. The simple truth seemed to be that what worked like a charm in 1995 is simply not working as well in 2015.<\/p>\n

There are two factors, however, that are difficult to escape. First, in 1995, customer satisfaction surveys were still a relatively new phenomenon. Companies and people were just starting to understand the value of surveys, and we had the clearly better mousetrap. In the intervening twenty years, however, everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, has jumped onto the proverbial bandwagon. In 1995, surveys were an interesting novelty, an intriguing idea. Today they are everywhere. We are bombarded by them wherever we turn, often unable to avoid them, even when we\u2019d prefer to. You can\u2019t conduct business online, can\u2019t buy something in a department store, can\u2019t buy a light bulb at Home Depot without being asked to participate in a survey. It\u2019s become a near glut, and like the trees in a forest, after a while you no longer even see them.<\/p>\n

The second factor is the growth of informational incompetence among our clients. In the early 90\u2019s we dealt with generally small companies, often \u201cmom and pop\u201d operations who generally knew their customers pretty well. Today we are mainly dealing with multi-billion dollar, multi-national conglomerates who have decrepit CRM systems, who take every informational shortcut they can when assembling a customer list, and who consistently have us trying to validate former employees, former customers, non-decision makers, and the dearly departed. In other words, a big part of our problem is application of the theory of garbage in, garbage out.
\nFor me its been the Elephant in the Room for years. No-one talks about response rates and yet, particularly in the B2B arena where the typical organisation has only a few hundred customers, a good, high response rate is a key component to having feedback that is useful rather than being \u201cinteresting\u201d. What do you think?<\/p>\n

Now take a look at How to Increase Response Rates – 6 Useful Tips<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Over the past couple days I\u2019ve been researching the general subject of Survey Response Rates. My normal interest in the subject became elevated when I ran across an article having to do with the ACSI (or American Customer Satisfaction Index). What caught my attention in terms of this email was the following quote \u2013 \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8521,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[128,115],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148808"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8521"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/customerthink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}