Becoming more customer-centric has moved from the “whether” column to the “when” column. Smart companies don’t try to wait out change. Nor do they continue trying to maintain dominant roles in buyer-seller relationships. Nor do they try getting away with “persuasive arguments” not backed up by products and services beneficial to customers.
Today, customers will punish the less-than-smart companies that do. They’ll punish them directly by taking their business elsewhere—as they have with Circuit City, Dell and Gateway. They’ll punish them indirectly by viral badmouthing—as they have with Apple (think iPhone rebates), Sprint and Wal-Mart. And in extreme cases, they’ll even punish them legally by appealing to the new breed of consumerist, U.S. attorneys general—as in the cases of Allianz, Ameriprise, Microsoft and half the pharmaceutical industry.
So what’s the alternative? How about dispensing with all the familiar bromides and self-congratulatory pats on the back and determining where the organization really stands on the customer-alignment continuum? While developing a new customer self assessment survey, my research partner David Mangen, Ph.D., and I identified six critical parameters that determine the degree of customer alignment for most companies. These six factors provide a good starting point for honest inquiry:
- Customer relationships
- Strategy
- Marketing
- Sales and service
- Process design
- Capacity to change
While each company, and especially across different industries, will have unique issues pertaining to each of these factors, all six matter to most businesses.
Executives intent on improving customer alignment should try rating the company on each of the six parameters—as objectively as they can, minus corporate “happy talk.” Then they can apply labels like these:
- Doing great. Even the best aligned companies shouldn’t rate more than a couple of these.
- Could stand some improvement. This is very much a positive rating.
- Needs prompt attention. Be honest.
- Putting us at risk with customers. This is common with underperforming companies, as well as “basket cases.”
Most companies will be surprised by what they learn.
Consider these examples of good customer alignment within each of the six factors.
Customer relationships
Companies should look hard at both management’s level of customer contact and the empowerment of line staff to deal with customer issues. In Mangen’s and my 2006 study of purchase drivers, Customers Say What Companies Don’t Want To Hear, customers rated dealing with empowered employees second only to a combination of quality product and quality service in importance. Good questions to ask include:
|
Strategy
Honestly, far too many companies wouldn’t know a strategy if it bit them. Strategy is not “making the numbers” or attaining an inflated stock price (think “all balloons eventually pop”) or increasing margins. Strategies are mid- to long-term business plans. They’re directional, not operational. Companies like 3M, Best Buy and GE have strategies. Companies like Circuit City, Palm and Sprint have panic attacks.
Companies heading for improved customer alignment should be asking themselves:
|
Marketing
Ironically, many marketing departments operate further out of alignment with customers than most other functions. And these splits are often widening, as the need to build relationships with customers creates demands that marketing staff aren’t necessarily trained for or even interested in meeting. Good questions to raise include:
|
Sales and service
Why lump these two functions together? Partly because they so often depend on each other for success. Partly because sales-service collaboration matters so much to customers. But also because customers appreciate shared values between the functions—as long as they’re customer-sensitive values. Probing questions to ask include:
|
Business process design
Of all aspects of business, process is the great laggard. Despite radical changes in virtually all non-manufacturing work environments, business continues applying 20- to 30-year-old manufacturing process approaches to functions doing far more variable work including, but not limited to, sales, marketing, customer service, accounts receivable, logistics and other customer-affecting functions. Good questions include:
|
Capacity to change
Five years ago, you could count the number of customer-aligned large companies on your fingers and toes. Today, there are many more. But most of the new arrivals endured some measure of organizational upheaval—often considerable upheaval—to make it to the other side. Questions companies intending to become more customer aligned should ask include:
|
Just asking these questions will help point companies wanting to “hit the road” and head down the right path towards customer-alignment.
If you’d like to spend less than 15 minutes getting a more detailed customer-alignment rating of your company, please take the free survey.
Dick
A great set of principles for customer alignment. I am sure they appeal to the employee and the customer in all of us. But what about the CFO in us?
Where is the financial business case for doing all of this? Only a foolhardy business would embark upon such a radical course as your questions imply, without first understanding how – through the customer behavioural effects chain – customer alignment will likely effect costs, revenues and risk, and ultimately, earnings, profits and cashflow.
I do not wish to condone short-termist financial thinking, far from it, but this type of thinking is reality in most companies today. If you want the CFO’s money, you have to show how you will spend it wisely and what return it is going to earn. Ultimately, no company gets rewarded for having highly satisfied, but unprofitable customers. So as Tom Cruise cried out in the film Jerry Maguire, “Show me the money!”.
Graham Hill
Independent CRM Consultant
Interim CRM Manager
Graham – HYM’s motto is “add new value to customers in ways that add new value to the company.” But if you confuse a customer-alignment gut check with an ROI assessment neither one of them will be accomplished.