Comcast Goes Sales Bottom-Fishing, Door-to-Door, Trying To Win Back Ex-Customers


Share on LinkedIn

Last Friday, a sales representative from Comcast came to our door, offering a 40% discount (he hand-wrote 40% OFF! on his business card) to switch back our cable service (from Verizon). We dropped Comcast three years ago, which the representative knew. What he didn’t know was why we left: because the service was both chronically poor and unresponsive. After rejecting his offer, I sent the sales guy on his way, to dangle the cash incentive in front of some other, perhaps more easily persuaded, household in our neighborhood.

Starting early last year, Comcast has lobbed millions of dollars into an initiative to improve service (and perception). Before turning down Comcast’s offer, I briefly explained our multiple reasons for leaving and why we weren’t interested in returning, seemingly attractive price notwithstanding. It was noteworthy that the rep didn’t try to say that anything had improved since we were Comcast customers. If the culture and level of executive commitment doesn’t change – and, at Comcast, my discussions with long-time managers there tell me that clearly the needle hasn’t moved very much – there is little chance that its reputation and image, or recovery of former customers, will improve.

Jeff Toister recently posted a blog in which all of this was nicely, and objectively, covered: As Jeff noted: “On a customer level, part of Comcast’s problem continues to be prioritizing short-term revenue over customer satisfaction” Again, this speaks to a culture where customer value is not a corporate priority.

In addition to the stats that Jeff quoted, it’s also interesting to note that, according to the 2016 Temkin Customer Service Ratings, just published last week, “Comcast, meanwhile, earned the lowest score in the Temkin Customer Service Ratings for the third straight year. Once again, the company received the two lowest scores in the Ratings, one for its TV service business and one for its Internet service….” For TV service, Time Warner Cable, Verizon, Cox, Bright House, and AT&T all had Temkin ratings twice as high as Comcast’s. There was similar 2:1 ratio in Temkin ISP rating superiority for Time Warner, Charter, and Cox. Again, this demonstrates that you can throw money and superficial performance measurement at an initiative; and, if the culture and discipline are insufficient to support goals, very little of real substance and lasting improvement will be achieved.

Being a low-cost provider means that brand, employee and customer strategies get less emphasis, and they ultimately get little commitment, in Comcast’s case despite substantial investment. A key reason companies have a difficult time achieving stronger customer loyalty, or recovering former customers, is that the fail to provide full value and emotional relationship fundamentals. They focus on satisfying customers exclusively through basic rational and functional benefits (also using metrics which give them little granular insight), which is often too benign and passive an approach to create lasting value and desired long-term relationships. I’m not necessarily singling out Comcast; but, smart marketers know that, for instance, being a low-cost provider can be a trap and that only overall perceived value will prevail.

In a 1980 Harvard Business Review article by William Hall he reported study results comparing companies that competed on differentiated customer value versus companies that competed principally on cost. On any important measure – return on equity, return on capital, and annual revenue growth – companies delivering both rational and relationship value beat the price competitors every time.

Consumers can almost always locate cheaper products or services, but the stronger motivation for selecting vendors is overall benefit. Ultimately, customers will invest a greater share of their purchase dollars, or be open to returning, with suppliers who create stronger emotional bonds and deliver superior perceived value. Competing on price, or any other single, tangible dimension, may pull away customers from other suppliers in the short run, but it will be difficult to keep them for long. Price is rarely a sufficient ‘barrier to exit’, and is more often an invitation to churn. Neither is it a lever to overcome poor prior perceived value.

Comcast could take some lessons from this; but research results (and current marketing approaches) suggest that becoming more customer-focused on a corporate cultural level is an unlikely near-term outcome. As Jeff observed: “… the focus is on media and technology, not customers. They also have a set of values that need help. One of those values is Integrity, which Comcast basically defines as not committing crimes.”

Michael Lowenstein, PhD CMC
Michael Lowenstein, PhD CMC, specializes in customer and employee experience research/strategy consulting, and brand, customer, and employee commitment and advocacy behavior research, consulting, and training. He has authored seven stakeholder-centric strategy books and 400+ articles, white papers and blogs. In 2018, he was named to CustomerThink's Hall of Fame.


  1. You do know that Comcast has had a door to door sales team for coming on 15 years now, right? It’s not a new development “to win back ex customers”, and that statement is a fairy truth anyways – they are not sending door to door people to knock on customers doors that already have Comcast of course. It’s a given that they will knock “ex customer” doors.

  2. Since leaving Comcast behind, this was not the first time we’ve had a sales rep come to our home; and I’ve long been aware they’ve had a localized winback program. And, of course, Comcast would have had our household in their records as ex-customers. What was different this time is that, despite all of the well-publicized investment Comcast has made in the past year. there was no effort on the rep’s part to counter the reasons we had left. All he did was offer a 40% discount. He didn’t say anything that would make me feel that Comcast cared about the reasons I’d left. If the rep wasn’t willing to be more of an ambassador for Comcast, the enticement of a cheaper service wasn’t enough to lure me back.

  3. Wow! I didn’t know Comcast had a door-to-door sales team. Some people must buy from them or I’d assume they wouldn’t do it.

    Interesting note about the 40% offer. I’ve heard from a few customers (including one of my blog readers) that have learned to play the game to get continual discounts. Each year, they call in, threaten to leave, and get another good deal. I suppose that works if they haven’t had a bad experience.

  4. Jeff –

    Customer recovery, though a smart thing for companies to do, is always an investment, and the numbers have to make sense for initiatives in this life-cycle stage to continue. Enough households will take the cash incentive that it’s productive for Comcast; and, unlike your blog reader, the “bet” is that the vast majority of recovered customers won’t go through the hassle and annoyance of trying to leave (, even if they might possibly get ongoing discounts – – experience notwithstanding. At Comcast, the name of the tune continues to be ‘profit first, customer experience value second’.


  5. I just switched to Direct TV and Centurylink after having been with Comcast for 5 years. I was not dissatisfied with their service or products, or even their customer service reps. It was a pricing issue. When I started with them in 2011 with the same exact pkg I was paying $125.00 a month. As of November, my pricing went to $250.00 a month!

    They really tried to keep me, but the best they could do was still $50.00 more a month than my new services.

    Having said that, the frigging nightmare I went through just setting up new service with DTV and Centurylink almost made me go screaming back to Comcast! I was on the phone with either from 10:30am to nearly 4pm because they had screwed up on oh so ways what I had ordered. I’m ashamed to say they reduced me to tears by 4pm.

    I now have DTV set up, but am without internet or landline until next Monday due to their screw ups. If I didn’t have my iPhone through Verizon, I’d be without phone as well. I’m disabled so it’s important I be able to have communication ability around.

    I have actually experienced better customer care with Comcast in the past 2 years, but their pricing will continue to lose them customers.

  6. Price, customer service, value, features…etc, they’re all perception. I do business with companies that I perceive to be more interested in doing business with me and provide better value. Ultimately, the writer isn’t wrong. However, I would ask, do you still have service with Verizon/FIOS? Or have you gone to another service provider, if so, why?

  7. Leo –

    We still have Verizon FiOS and are pleased with the service. Whenever there is a performance issue – which is very, very rare – Verizon comes to our home immediately. We’ve never had to a pay for these visits.



Please use comments to add value to the discussion. Maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. We will NOT PUBLISH brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here