Choosing between being strategic or being agile is a false dichotomy


Share on LinkedIn

“Agile marketing” is a crutch for those who do not have a real strategy.

That was the headline from an article published this week by Samuel Scott on The Drum.

Now, I’m a fan of The Drum. They generally have sharp coverage of marketing and media topics. I’m also a fan of Samuel in particular. His writing is punchy and makes you think.

But painting agile marketing and strategic brand leadership as polar opposites is a terrible mischaracterization of agile marketing.

I give him credit for calling BS on marketers who use abuse the term “agile” as a cover for a lack of strategic direction. If you’re just juggling a bunch of random tactics without any overarching strategy and calling it “agile” — you’re doing it wrong. (And, unfortunately, he’s probably right that too many marketers are.)

But if you think that’s what agile marketing is supposed to be, you’re mistaken.

Agile marketing amplifies strategy in a digital world

Agile management is not a strategy. Agile is an instrument of strategy.

Agile management is a way to execute a strategy when either (a) the environment in which you’re operating is fluid and shifting, and you want to rapidly sense and respond to those changes, or (b) the media in which you’re rendering your strategy is malleable and has fast feedback loops — hello, digital world — giving you the valuable option to iteratively optimize your execution quickly and cheaply.

Marketing today has both of those properties. What marketing executive wouldn’t want to harness those dynamics to outmaneuver and outperform their competition?

Of course, it still requires them to have a vision, a strategy, or — more flexibly — a set of strategic hypotheses. Without that, agile methods are a random walk. But when agile methods are connected to and governed by a clear strategy, agile optimizes the operational reality of that strategy beautifully.

As shown in the illustration at the top of this post, well-structured “sprints” — the short, one-week-to-one-month iterations in Scrum-style agile management — are intentionally designed to be closely tied to strategy:

  • The backlog of things to be tackled by the team are continuously prioritized according to strategic goals. It’s a forcing function to make choices and trade-offs, and to paraphrase marketing strategy legend A.G. Lafley, strategy is choice.
  • The sprint planning session at the beginning of each sprint frames the work selected to be done that cycle in the context of strategic stories and themes.
  • The sprint itself resists interrupt-driven changes to the priorities being addressed in that cycle — if at all possible, postponing “fire drills” until the next sprint planning session, so that the team maintains its focus on the strategic work in progress.
  • The sprint review at the end of the cycle evaluates what was accomplished in that sprint through the lens of the organization’s strategic goals — and provides valuable feedback back to the strategic leadership layer of the firm.

It’s important to note that agile marketing also supports strategic leadership bidirectionally. Agile relies on strategic oversight to guide its execution. But it also provides a mechanism to inform strategy of changes “on the ground” — detecting when strategy and reality diverge.

Evolutionary Strategy through Agile Marketing

Agile generally doesn’t change strategy on a sprint-by-sprint basis. But it also doesn’t let a bad, outdated, or disrupted strategy go too far off course before providing empirical data necessary to make an informed correction.

Like it or not, modern marketing is entwined with software

Samuel’s frustration with “agile marketing” is expressed in a broader rejection of the idea that marketers should be software developers, which he seems to think was what I was advocating for in my book Hacking Marketing (which is largely about explaining agile marketing).

That wasn’t my argument.

Marketers don’t have to be software developers — a point I explicitly make in the book and have stated many times on this blog and in hundreds of presentations.

However, they are deeply dependent on the digital dynamics of software. So they should strive to understand those dynamics, both to inform their strategy and to create the right kinds of capabilities and organizational capital necessary to realize that strategy in a digital world.

And because software developers have been wrestling with those dynamics for 50 years — I’ve called them “the canaries in the digital coal mine” — it can be a smart idea to borrow proven management concepts from the software profession and adapt them to marketing.

Samuel seems annoyed by this though, writing, “Too many suit-and-tie marketers seem to loathe themselves, hate their jobs, and wish they were hoodie-wearing software developers instead. It is the only reason that I can surmise why the digital marketing world adopts so much of the trendy vocabulary of the high-tech industry without question.”

(As an aside, there’s something funny about that. When I was a kid, marketing — well, mostly advertising — was considered cool. Software development, which was what I was into, was not.)

Incorporating ideas from the software profession into marketing doesn’t inherently displace what marketing is all about or the myriad of strategic and operational approaches it brings to bear on its mission. Thinking it must is a false dichotomy. It simply augments them and updates them to today’s environment.

Marketers shouldn’t borrow ideas from the software world simply because of their software roots. But they shouldn’t reject them simply because of that ancestry either. Assuming that there’s nothing to be learned from an adjacent (and increasingly overlapping) profession is a reckless mindset — especially in an era of great change and upheaval.

Marketers who do that, ironically, are inadvertently borrowing a dangerous anti-pattern from the software profession that has plagued developers for decades: the hubris of “not-invented-here.”

P.S. For further reading on this subject, here are a couple of earlier articles I wrote that are relevant to this conversation: Pragmatic Marketing vs. Hype Cycles and False Dilemmas and 3 Myths of Agile Marketing.

P.P.S. Want to learn how to run agile marketing the right way? Sign up for Andrea Fryrear’s half-day workshop, Agile Marketing Advantage, at the upcoming MarTech conference in Boston, October 1-3. Here’s a peek at more of the agenda of the event, focused on the intersection of marketing, technology, and management.

Republished with author's permission from original post.

Scott Brinker
Scott Brinker is the president & CTO of ion interactive, a leading provider of post-click marketing software and services. He writes the Conversion Science column on Search Engine Land and frequently speaks at industry events such as SMX, Pubcon and Search Insider Summit. He chairs the marketing track at the Semantic Technology Conference. He also writes a blog on marketing technology, Chief Marketing Technologist.


Please use comments to add value to the discussion. Maximum one link to an educational blog post or article. We will NOT PUBLISH brief comments like "good post," comments that mainly promote links, or comments with links to companies, products, or services.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here